Why No Uber In Goa? Iim Alum’s Post Exposes The Real Reason No One Dares Allow It

Sedang Trending 6 jam yang lalu

Because Goa’s locals aren’t asking for Uber. With 882 vehicles per 1,000 people—four times nan nationalist average—residents thrust themselves.

Why nary Uber successful Goa? IIM alum’s station exposes nan existent logic nary 1 dares let itThe calculus whitethorn alteration eventually. An aging population, shifting to atomic families, and increasing appetite for convenience could build section request for taxis again.

Uber isn’t banned successful Goa. It’s conscionable been mathematically eliminated.

“Tourists support asking: why nary Uber successful Goa? The reply isn’t policy. It’s elemental math.”

That’s really Lokesh Ahuja, a business planner and IIM alumnus, opens a LinkedIn station that’s now stirring speech acold beyond firm circles. 

His breakdown of Goa’s ride-hailing void doesn’t hinge connected authorities bans aliases outdated laws. It rests connected hard, section economics—and a staggering electoral calculus.

Start pinch nan numbers. Goa has 24,000 taxi drivers. Most are sole breadwinners, supporting families of four. 

That’s astir 100,000 group tethered to nan taxi economy. But these drivers aren’t conscionable down nan wheel. “Drivers besides enactment arsenic committee agents—guiding visitors to hotels, cruises, shops, shacks,” Ahuja notes. Their net ripple done nan full tourism sector.

Factor that in, and nan number of livelihoods connected to this informal web balloons to 200,000.

Now use politics. About 75% of those individuals are apt eligible voters. That’s 1.5 lakh votes—more than 1 successful 10 of Goa’s full electorate. “No politician’s rubbing that,” Ahuja writes. “Lose 1.5 lakh votes. Gain zero.”

Why zero? Because Goa’s locals aren’t asking for Uber. With 882 vehicles per 1,000 people—four times nan nationalist average—residents thrust themselves. The only ones craving ride-hailing services are tourists. And tourists, Ahuja dryly points out, don’t vote.

The accusation is clear: introducing Uber isn’t conscionable economically disruptive—it’s governmental suicide.

The calculus whitethorn alteration eventually. An aging population, shifting to atomic families, and increasing appetite for convenience could build section request for taxis again. Until then, nan cab wars enactment “parked,” arsenic Ahuja puts it, and Uber remains connected nan outside.

“Goa doesn’t request argumentation reform,” he concludes. “It needs nan mathematics to change.”

Published on: Jun 16, 2025 10:32 AM IST

Selengkapnya