Robert Maginnis: Don’t Be Misled—iran Isn’t Days Away From A Nuclear Bomb

As tensions betwixt Israel and Iran escalate, nan airwaves are afloat of alarmist commentary. Military analysts and governmental leaders alike are informing that Tehran is "on nan brink" of possessing a atomic weapon. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt moreover claimed, "Iran has each that it needs to execute a atomic limb … and it would return a mates weeks to complete nan accumulation of that weapon." This is not conscionable a misstatement. It is misinformation—and it risks pushing nan United States into a hasty and unjustified war.

HOW CLOSE WAS IRAN TO A NUCLEAR WEAPON BEFORE ISRAEL’S STRIKE ON TEHRAN?

The reality is acold much complex. Enriched uranium—even astatine weapons-grade levels—is only 1 constituent of a long, technically demanding process required to create a functional atomic bomb. Understanding why this alarmism is premature requires a clear breakdown of what’s really progressive successful building specified a device.

According to U.S. experts and declassified intelligence assessments, a atomic limb requires astatine slightest nan following elements:

1. Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU): Iran would request U-235 enriched to 90%, but that unsocial is insufficient.
2. Precision Shaping: The uranium must beryllium machined into a flawless sphere, requiring high-end metallurgy and computing.
3. Explosive Lenses: Carefully placed charges must detonate simultaneously to compress nan core—a method called implosion.
4. Trigger Mechanisms: These detonators must beryllium precisely synchronized; moreover a microsecond hold renders nan limb ineffective.
5. Reflectors and Tampers: Elements for illustration beryllium are required to support compression and prolong nan concatenation reaction.
6. Weaponization: The explosive must beryllium ruggedized into a functional assembly, including casing and electronics that tin past delivery.
7. Delivery Systems: The limb must beryllium fitted onto a missile, aircraft, aliases different level tin of reaching its target.

In summation to enriched uranium and implosion mechanisms, a functional atomic limb requires respective other complex components that Iran has not demonstrably mastered. These see a neutron initiator to trigger nan concatenation reaction, precision fusing and arming systems, and reentry conveyance exertion if nan limb is to beryllium missile-delivered. A reliable atomic arsenal besides demands sub-critical testing infrastructure to validate creation functionality and information protocols to power explosive yield. These method requirements impact precocious engineering, testing, and materials—none of which are confirmed to beryllium successful Iran’s programme today.

FORDO, IRAN -- JUNE 14, 2025: 05  Maxar outer imagery overview of nan Fordo enrichment installation located astir 60 miles southwest of Tehran. No visible harm is observed. Please use: Satellite image (c) 2025 Maxar Technologies. (Satellite image (c) 2025 Maxar Technologies via Getty)

Each of these steps represents a superior technological challenge. While Iran has demonstrated enrichment capabilities, location is nary reliable open-source grounds that it has mastered nan different basal components. The astir difficult hurdle—weaponization—remains nan astir classified and technically precocious portion of nan full process.

Yet Israel’s caller week of strikes connected Iranian atomic and subject facilities—including nan deeply buried Fordow enrichment site adjacent Qom—were reportedly driven by fears that Iran had crossed nan 90% enrichment threshold. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Iran now possesses capable enriched uranium for "nine atomic weapons" and nan IDF’s Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir warned of an "immediate operational necessity" arsenic Iran had "reached nan constituent of nary return." However, nan International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and U.S. intelligence assessments person not publically corroborated immoderate advancement toward assembling a usable bomb.

The Fordow facility, often portrayed arsenic a last day site, is not a weapons lab. It is an enrichment plant—too heavy to onslaught easily, but besides excessively constrained to test, assemble, aliases motorboat a atomic weapon. That truth unsocial should punctual nan question: Why onslaught now?

Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei addresses nan media during nan voting of Parliament Elections successful Tehran, Iran connected May 10, 2024. (Photo by Fatemeh Bahrami/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Netanyahu’s warnings are not new. In 2012, he told NBC’s Meet nan Press that Iran would person capable worldly for a explosive successful "six aliases 7 months," urging nan U.S. to tie a "red line" earlier it was "too late." The dire prediction ne'er materialized. No explosive was built. No reddish statement crossed. The section offers a instruction successful really worst-case scenarios, not verified facts, tin thrust nan conversation.

Before nan United States commits to subject action, President Trump—and nan American people—deserve clear answers: Does Iran person nan basal components, nan creation knowledge, and nan capacity to combine and present a functioning weapon? Or are we risking warfare based connected fearfulness and incomplete intelligence?

We person been present before. In 2003, nan U.S. invaded Iraq complete weapons of wide demolition that did not exist. That warfare costs thousands of lives, almost three trillion dollars to nan present, destabilized a region, and damaged U.S. credibility for decades. To repetition specified a correction would beryllium strategical malpractice of nan highest order.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

None of this downplays nan threat Iran poses. The regime’s support for proxy militias, its ballistic rocket program, and its shape of obstructing IAEA inspections are profoundly troubling. But deterrence and diplomacy—not preemptive war—must beryllium nan first response. The United States retains a afloat suite of tools: cyber operations, location rocket defense, economical sanctions, and multilateral diplomacy. Military action should stay nan last option—not nan opening move.

As Australian novelist Kate Forsyth reminds us: "War is an unpredictable beast. Once unleashed, it runs for illustration a rabid dog, ravening friend aliases foe alike." Let america not unleash that beast complete uranium that is dangerous—but not yet detonatable.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

President Trump, Congress, and our intelligence organization must present a full, honorable accounting. What does nan United States know—not suspect—about Iran’s atomic readiness? What pieces are still missing? What devices short of warfare tin guarantee they enactment missing?

These are nan questions that must beryllium answered earlier different rocket is fired. Panic is not a policy. Precision is.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ROBERT MAGINNIS